The Red List of Trains in Japan (Jun-2025 update)

The Red List of Trains in Japan is now up to date! No new article this time, but many existing articles have got the latest figures. Important changes include:

• Rolled back the status of JR East 255 series from EXTINCT to CRITICALLY ENDANGERED, as the company decided to retain one for a while despite its farewell tour being conducted last year
• Changed the status of Isumi Railway 300 and 350 series as the line itself has been "temporarily" closed for years

I also recently discovered that my website has been used for academic purposes. While I am truly grateful for it, I would like to emphasise that this website is just a personal, unofficial one. I always endeavour to provide accurate and up-to-date information as much as possible, but you should always consider very carefully before you cite anything on my website and this blog.

The Tram, another stark reminder from the past

Hiroshima is known for having the most extensive tram network in Japan. Most tourists to here visit the the Peace Memorial Museum and Genbaku Dome (also known as the Atomic Bomb Dome) just like G7 leaders did in 2023. Many people believe that the Dome is the only survivor of the very first nuclear attack in history, but as BBC reported back in 2015, it is not true. This is No. 651 of Hiroshima's tram, one of few vehicles that survived the day.

This is Hiroshima Electric Railway 650 series, a tram type developed in 1942. Five trams were introduced, and all of them were damaged at quarter past eight on 6th August 1945, some of them destroyed. Yet, the company repaired all of them and thus they were all eventually reinstated. All 650 series trams were supposed to be withdrawn by 2006, but the company decided to preserve some of them. Today, three trams are still registered for mainline use, and they are often used as charter trains including school trips for teenagers. In addition, nos. 651 and 652 sometimes run during morning rush hours on weekdays.

No. 651 was about to depart Fukuromachi tram stop towards Senda depot, presumably after being used for a charter train on Saturday afternoon. The grey building on the left is the former Hiroshima Branch of the Bank of Japan, another building that withstood the bomb. Together with modern buildings nearby, they highlight how much the city has developed since then, and how important it is to preserve such heritage to remember that day.

It should be noted that the heritage sites in Hiroshima have been preserved not to emphasise the "atrocities committed by the United States", but rather to serve as a memorial, reminding us that regardless of views on nuclear weapons, they should never be used again under any circumstances. As the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War (commonly known outside Japan as the VJ Day) is approaching, and given that the substantial risk of another nuclear attack amidst conflicts including those in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and South Asia, the 650 series trams are not just cute and retro vehicles, but they present us a stark warning.

Shinkansen, the confusing fare schemes

In Japan, bullet train passengers generally have to purchase two tickets, a standard fare ticket and a limited express fare ticket (Shinkansen fare ticket). However, the standard fare ticket is not necessarily based on an actual route, and most passengers are paying more than they are supposed to be. This article focuses on the hidden rules that not many people know.

Passengers going from Tokyo to Shin-Osaka by Shinkansen always have two tickets mentioned above that cover Tokyo and Shin-Osaka. Generally speaking, fares for those tickets are calculated based on distance between two stations. However, they are not in case of Shinkansen tickets, and passengers often pay more than they should, in addition to the expensive Shinkansen fare ticket.

To put it simply, standard fares for Shinkansen are based on those of a "conventional line" (non-high-speed railway) parallel to each other. For example, even when they use Tokaido Shinkansen from Tokyo to Shin-Osaka, the standard fare is based on the distance between these two stations via Tokaido Main Line. Shinkansen tracks are generally shorter than conventional lines, but JR companies have been charging passengers based on longer distances. For example, a table below shows the technical and actual distance between major stations.

	Actual	Calculated as
Tokyo - Shin-Osaka	515.4 km	562.6 km
Shin-Osaka - Hakata	553.7 km	622.3 km
Tokyo - Sendai	325.4 km	351.8 km
Tokyo - Niigata	300.8 km	333.9 km

Another table below shows how fares have gone up based on the figures mentioned above.

	Fair fare	Actual fare
Tokyo - Shin-Osaka	8,360 yen	8,910 yen
Shin-Osaka - Hakata	8,910 yen	9,790 yen
Tokyo - Sendai	5,510 yen	5,730 yen
Tokyo - Niigata	5,180 yen	5,510 yen

As the tables show, the differences are not small, enough to buy a bottle of water or even a small bento for lunch.

This rule dates back to 1964, when Tokaido Shinkansen opened but Japanese National Railways did not add any change to the standard fare scheme. JNR insisted that Tokaido Shinkansen was constructed as second Tokaido Main Line, so the same fares should be applied. In 1975, a passenger, who found that the actual distance between Tokyo and Shin-Osaka via Tokaido Shinkansen was shorter than that via Tokaido Main Line, demanded a partial refund from JNR and sued it (though it was dismissed unanimously by the Supreme Court in 1986).

This rule, which is now written in Article 16-2 Paragraph 1 of the Rules for Passenger Services, is not always disadvantageous for passengers. For example, the ticket above is from Tsuyama to Yokohama via San-yo and Tokaido Main Line (conventional lines), but there are Shinkansen stamps. In this case, I could choose whether to take a Shinkansen from Okayama to Shin-Yokohama, or to take an ordinary train from Okayama to Yokohama. I could also freely switch from Shinkansen to conventional lines and vice versa at stations in between.

According to the rules, a person with a ticket from Tokyo or Nagoya to Osaka can either take Shinkansen to Shin-Osaka directly or alight the train at Kyoto for sightseeing and continue on to Osaka after that.

JNR applied the same rules to San-yo, Joetsu and Tohoku Shinkansen when they opened in 1972 (extended to Hakata in 1975) and 1982, respectively. Hence, San-yo Shinkansen was treated as the same as San-yo Main Line (and Kagoshima Main Line in Fukuoka Prefecture), Tohoku Shinkansen was effectively the same as Tohoku Main Line and Joetsu Shinkansen was treated as Joetsu Line.

The privatization of JNR made the rules questionable, especially when it comes to Tokaido and San-yo Shinkansen. Unlike others, conventional lines parallel to those two Shinkansen are operated by different JR companies as shown below. Osaka and Shimonoseki also correspond to Shin-Osaka and Shin-Shimonoseki, respectively.

	Shinkansen	Conventional
Tokyo - Atami	JR Central	JR East
Atami - Maibara		JR Central
Maibara - (Osaka)		JR West
(Osaka) - (Shimonoseki)	JR West
(Shimonoseki) - (Hakata)		JR Kyushu

When the high-speed rail and conventional lines nearby are owned and managed by different companies, how could those railways be regarded as the same?

JR Kyushu suggested a possible solution. In 1996, JR Kyushu withdrew from the scheme and has set its own fares between Shimonoseki and Hakata. Hence, a passenger with a standard fare ticket that covers Shimonoseki (or Shin-Shimonoseki), Kokura or Hakata has to decide which route to take. Since then, conventional lines there are more expensive than San-yo Shinkansen when it comes to a standard fare ticket. For example, a standard fare ticket between Kokura and Hakata is 1,170 yen for San-yo Shinkansen, but 1,510 yen for Kagoshima Main Line. Even with a limited express ticket, the total cost is 2,160 yen for Shinkansen (taking 17 minutes), while it is 2,110 yen for Limited Express on the conventional line (taking 49 minutes), so JR Kyushu has been struggling to attract passengers between the two cities (most people would prefer Shinkansen, as it is more frequent and far faster than JR Kyushu with just an extra of 50 yen).

JR East is soon to follow JR Kyushu as part of its plan to dramatically raise fares, as described in the previous article. The change will solve the confusing fare schemes and make it easy to understand for Shinkansen travellers, though it is not clear whether it will be beneficial for passengers.

JR fare schemes change in 2026

JR East has published three documents last year regarding fare increase and changes in fare schemes. On 2 December, six JR companies including JR East announced that they will discontinue the sale of return (round-trip) tickets in March 2026, which will be a huge blow to long-distance travellers. Four days later, JR East announced a fare increase of 7.1% on average in March 2026 with a lengthy 49-page document. On 10 December, JR East also announced the major upgrade of Suica services called "Suica Renaissance" which this blog article does NOT refer to.

The demise of return tickets

A return ticket is, as the name suggests, a pair of two tickets between two stations. The price is generally twice the single fare, and the entire trip is valid for twice the duration of a single ticket. JR East and other JRs across the country insist that Suica and relevant cards have been widely used and many passengers prefer booking online so that they have decided to terminate the sale of return tickets, claims that are highly dubious.

Most people might think that purchasing a return ticket and buying two single tickets are the same, but there are a few differences. First, if a journey is longer than 601 km, there is a 10% discount ("往復割引", often abbreviated as "復割") for a return ticket. For example, the single fare for a 601 km journey is 9,790 yen, so purchasing two single tickets costs 19,580 yen. However, when the return discount is applied, the price is down to 17,620 yen. The discount is even greater for longer journeys, which travellers have long benefitted from. When the return ticket is discontinued, the discount will also be abolished.

Secondly, a return ticket can be refunded easily in case of major disruptions caused by natural disasters, while it could be difficult for single tickets. What if, for example, one plans to travel from Tokyo to Osaka and go back on the next day, and a train is cancelled on the first day due to a typhoon? In case of a return ticket, they can ask for a full refund even if the train services resume on the second day. However, when it comes to two single tickets, they can only get a full refund for the first ticket, while the second ticket is not eligible for it. Buying tickets separately (purchasing each ticket just before getting on a train) would work well, but given that JR companies urge people to purchase tickets in advance, and ticket offices are always extremely crowded, it is not a sensible idea.

Thirdly, it will be difficult to apply other discounts, such as student discount (20% discount on standard fare tickets, often abbreviated as "学割") or Zipangu Club discount (20-30% discount on both standard fare tickets and limited express tickets, eligible for elderly people). These discounts require a special application form, but it is not unlimited. For example, universities usually issue up to 10-20 forms per year. Students submit one for a return ticket, but after March 2026, they will have to use two forms for a trip.

Scheme changes behind the fare increase

There are a few changes of fare schemes that are not necessarily well-known. First, two fare schemes in Tokyo, namely "電車特定区間 (lit. specific train zone)" and "東京山手線内(lit. Yamanote Line zone)", will be abolished. They were introduced by Japanese National Railways in 1984, cheaper than fares of other "main lines (幹線)" as there has been competition with private railways. After March 2026, commuter lines in Greater Tokyo, Chiba, Ibaraki, Kanagawa and Saitama Prefectures will be classified as "main lines", resulting in a significant fare increase of up to 16.4%.

Furthermore, most of special fares for specific sections, which have been applied for highly competitive routes, will also be abolished. Some commuters might consider shifting from JR East to its rivals. For example, the table below shows the comparison between JR and Tokyo Metro.

	JR East   before Mar 2026	JR East   (after Mar 2026)	Tokyo Metro
Tokyo - Shinjuku	210 yen (15 mins)	260 yen (15 mins)	210 yen (18 mins)
Shibuya - Ueno	210 yen (32 mins)	260 yen (32 mins)	210 yen (27 mins)

The changes might not look huge, but the difference will be greater when it comes to season tickets. If Tokyo Metro keeps the fares at the present level, Marunouchi Line is likely to be affected the most and get more crowded than today, as it is parallel to Chuo and Yamanote Lines.

Another noticeable change comes to any standard fare tickets that include Tokaido Main Line between Tokyo and Atami. Tokaido Main Line and Tokaido Shinkansen are technically treated as the same line, and thus passengers are free to choose either one.

After March 2026, the basic fare for any ticket including Tokyo, Shinagawa, Yokohama (or Shin-Yokohama), Odawara or Atami stations have to choose which route to go. While long-distance travellers are not likely to be affected, those going to or from eastern Shizuoka Prefecture or western Kanagawa Prefecture should be careful.

Furthermore, a person who misses Limited Express Sunrise Seto or Sunrise Izumo at Tokyo station and wishes to take Shinkansen and catch the night train at Shizuoka station, will have to purchase another standard fare ticket. A stark reminder of the importance of giving oneself extra time (though this is applicable to very few people).

Standard Compartment

Compartment seating was once commonly used for train travels. In the early days of railway history, compartment coaches were used even for short-distance trains on London Underground. Compartment coaches are rare in the United Kingdom these days except a few special trains, but they are widely used in the Continent even today.

Many long-distance trains in Japan including bullet trains once had compartments as well, but they have mostly disappeared. In Japan, compartments are mainly used only by one group or family of three to six, but the demand for them declined after the 1960s as large-group trips became out of date. Today, more than 99% of regular trains are open-coach, and just a handful of limited express services have compartments.

Special fares are applied in most cases, but there are a few exceptions. This article focuses on two train types on JR network that have standard-class compartments.

700 series bullet train has four compartments in coach 8. Compartments on bullet trains were mostly Green Car (first class) until 2004, but the ones on the 700 series are standard class. Each compartment is for three or four passengers, so an individual or a group of two cannot make a reservation. Furthermore, the compartments are available on just a few services listed below, making it difficult to enjoy a trip.

• Westbound
• Kodama 847, Shin-Osaka (10:37) ⇒ Hakata (14:51)
• Kodama 865, Shin-Osaka (18:37) ⇒ Hakata (22:51)
• Eastbound
• Hikari 590, Shin-Shimonoseki (6:11) ⇒ Okayama (8:23)
• Kodama 840, Hakata (6:21) ⇒ Shin-Osaka (10:25)
• Kodama 856, Hakata (13:51) ⇒ Shin-Osaka (18:25)
• Kodama 860, Hakata (15:54) ⇒ Shin-Osaka (20:25)
• Kodama 866, Hakata (17:55) ⇒ Shin-Osaka (22:12)

However, when the 700 series runs Hakata-Minami Line, compartments are generally left open, which might sound an alternative option, though it is not always valuable for outsiders as Hakata-Minami station is not a place for tourists.

Another option is 373 series. It is not well known that this short and old limited express train actually has compartments. They are available on Limited Express Fujikawa (Shizuoka – Kofu) and Inaji (Toyohashi – Iida), Homeliner services that run either between Numazu and Shizuoka or Shizuoka and Hamamatsu, and a few stopping services on Iida and Tokaido Main Lines. Those on limited express and Homeliner services require seat reservation. Note that the compartments are not for sale on internet, so you have to go to a ticket office and tell staff that you would like to book a compartment.

Compartment seating is generally more expensive than ordinary seating on a limited express service but these two are reasonable as they do not charge extra fares. Those who wish to make a trip with more than three people are recommended to consider booking one…even though none of them are necessarily useful for tourists.